Good Day All!
I have a customer that is requesting that he wants a shine put on his vehicle that will sheet the water off and not bead.
Any thoughts on a kick a$$ polish, sealant, or wax??
Good Day All!
I have a customer that is requesting that he wants a shine put on his vehicle that will sheet the water off and not bead.
Any thoughts on a kick a$$ polish, sealant, or wax??
WHADDYA MEAN YOUR CIGARETTE LIGHTER DOESN`T WORK AFTER WE WASHED THE CAR!!
According to Mike Phillips meg`s gold class will sheet as opposed to bead. I remember when I used GC it would sheet, just the durability was questionable. I still think it gives a vehicle a great look.
Again, I would agree!
EBP,
You`re getting to fast for me!
GC always beaded for me, did not last long and was VERY dusty when buffing off.
In many instances excessive dust when removing a product is because you applied too much product. Thin coats always work better for me, no matter what the product.Originally posted by windsor
GC always beaded for me, did not last long and was VERY dusty when buffing off.
Charles
I always found GC to be low-dusting, easy on, easy off. I always applied really thin layers though.
The dust in GC is lots of "fillers". When applied as directed(thin), it is excessively "dusty".
Fillers? I tend to think of fillers as something that is left behind by a polish like the #9. What makes you feel that the excess dust you have experienced with GC is the result of "fillers"? Not challenging your post, just curious. I guess it is a classic case of "your mileage may vary"
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks